Two federal district courts have recently ruled against employers seeking to dismiss class action lawsuits filed against them by employees and former employees who, as smokers, paid higher health premiums than non-smokers a common, legally-authorized wellness feature of many group health plans
Supreme Court (1990), although Albrechts continuing validity was not squarely before the Court, some disfavor with that decision was signaled by our statement that we would assume, arguendo , that Albrecht correctly held that vertical, maximum price fixing is subject to the per se rule. More significantly, we specifically acknowledged that vertical maximum price fixing may have procompetitive interbrand effects, and pointed out that, in the wake of GTE Sylvania , the procompetitive potential of a vertical maximum price restraint is more evidentthan it was when Albrecht was decided, because exclusive territorial arrangements and other nonprice restrictions were unlawful per se in 1968. Thus, our reconsideration of Albrechts continuing validity is informed by several of our decisions, as well as a considerable body of scholarship discussing the effects of vertical restraints
I would say it maybe leans feminine so it depends on what you can personally pull off
United States antitrust law In the United States, antitrust law is a collection of mostly federal laws that govern the conduct and organization of businesses in order to promote economic competition and prevent unjustified monopolies
